Skip to main content
Download PDF

microRNA-26a suppresses recruitment of macrophages by down-regulating macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression through the PI3K/Akt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal of Hematology & Oncology volume 8, Article number: 56 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to modulate macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and macrophages. The aim of this study was to find whether miR-26a can suppress M-CSF expression and the recruitment of macrophages.

Methods

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines with decreased or increased expression of miR-26a were established in a previous study. M-CSF expression by tumor cells was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and cell migration assays were used to explore the effect of HCC cell lines on macrophage recruitment in vitro. Real-time PCR measured a panel of mRNAs expressed by macrophages. Xenograft models were used to observe tumor growth. Immunohistochemistry was conducted to study the relation between miR-26a expression and M-CSF expression and macrophage recruitment in patients with HCC.

Results

Ectopic expression of miR-26a reduced expression of M-CSF. The conditioned medium (CM) from HepG2 cells that overexpressed miR-26a reduced the migration ability of THP-1 cells stimulated by phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) increased expression of interleukin (IL)-12b or IL-23 mRNA and decreased expression of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand (CCL)22, CCL17, and IL-10 mRNA, in comparison to the medium from the parental HepG2 cells. These effects could be interrupted by the PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor LY294002. Ectopic expression of miR-26a in HCC cells suppressed tumor growth, M-CSF expression, and infiltration of macrophages in tumors. Similar results were also found when using HCCLM3 cells. Furthermore, the expression of miR-26a was inversely correlated with M-CSF expression and macrophage infiltration in tumor tissues from patients with HCC.

Conclusions

miR-26a expression reduced M-CSF expression and recruitment of macrophages in HCC.

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Treatment of HCC has changed greatly in recent years, but hepatic resection and transplantation are still considered the main curative therapy, and a high postoperative recurrence rate is a major impediment to prolonging patient survival [2].

Crosstalk between tumor cells and their microenvironment underlies the pathogenesis of HCC [3]. Transplantation of normal hepatocytes into a neoplastic-prone liver microenvironment delays the growth of hepatic nodules and the emergence of HCC [4]. A unique immune/inflammation response signature is associated with HCC intrahepatic metastasis, and inflammatory cytokines can predict poor survival of patients with HCC [5, 6]. These findings suggest that the immune/inflammation microenvironment may foster the development of HCC. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are key components of the cancer microenvironment [7, 8]. TAMs originate from circulating monocyte precursors that are recruited to the tumor by tumor-derived signals, including chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF). In response to distinct microenvironment signals, macrophages can exert either anti- or pro-tumor activities [9], classified as M1 (or classical) or M2 (or alternatively activated), respectively [10, 11]. In HCC, most macrophages in the peritumor region exhibit an M2 phenotype, which is probably determined by the tumor cell [12, 13]. These macrophages facilitate tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis and are associated with poor patient survival [13–16]. In many types of tumors, M-CSF is an essential regulator or recruiter of macrophages and is mainly produced by tumor cells [17, 18]. After binding to colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF-1R) on macrophages, M-CSF can activate macrophages, promoting secretion of growth factors that are essential for the pre-metastatic niche and tumor growth or metastasis [19–21]. Some studies have also found high expression of M-CSF and its receptor in peritumoral liver tissue, which is associated with poor survival of patients with HCC after curative resection [6, 22].

microRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of 22-nucleotide noncoding RNAs. The aberrant expression of specific miRNAs is directly involved in tumorigenesis, including growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastasis [23–27] and affects the biology of cellular components belonging to the tumor microenvironment, including endothelial cells, pericytes, fibroblasts, and immune cells [28–31]. In HCC, miRNAs have been reported to regulate the biology of endothelial cells and Treg cells [32, 33]. It has also been reported that miR-214 modulates macrophage polarization in HCC [34]. However, no study has addressed whether miRNAs regulate M-CSF expression in tumor cells and the recruitment of macrophages in HCC.

Deregulation of miR-26a may function as either a tumor suppressor or promoter. miR-26a is down-regulated in breast cancer, anaplastic carcinomas, and oral squamous cell carcinoma [35–38] but up-regulated in cholangiocarcinoma and glioma [39–41]. In HCC, a reduced level of miR-26a is associated with poor overall survival of patients with HCC [42]. Patients with hepatitis B virus-related HCC had a lower level of miR-26a in blood compared with patients with chronic hepatitis B [43]. In addition, miR-26a can inhibit cancer cell proliferation and protect against disease progression without toxicity in an HCC mouse model [44–46]. The underlying mechanisms might be that miR-26a can inhibit tumor growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis in HCC [27, 44, 47, 48]. However, no study has addressed the role of miR-26a in TAMs.

In the present study, we investigated whether miR-26a regulates recruitment and function of macrophages in HCC and the underlying mechanisms of miR-26a.

Results

miR-26a suppressed the attraction of macrophages by inhibiting M-CSF secretion

In a previous study [27], we found miR-26a suppressed the activation of the PI3K/Akt signal pathway. Because M-CSF is an important cytokine for macrophage recruitment and can be modulated by the PI3K/Akt signal pathway [49], we investigated whether miR-26a can regulate the expression of M-CSF and the attraction of macrophages in HCC.

We first collected conditioned medium (CM) from HCC cell lines established in our previous study that stably expressed miR-26a at different levels. These cells lines included HepG2-wt (wild type of HepG2), HepG2-control (HepG2 transfected with the negative control of precursor miRNA), and HepG2-miR-26a (HepG2 transfected with pre-miR-26a) and HCCLM3-wt (wild type of HCCLM3), HCCLM3-control (HCCLM3 transfected with the negative control of anti-miRNA-locked nucleic acids [LNAs]), and HCCLM3-anti-miR-26a (HCCLM3 transfected with anti-miRNA-LNAs against miR-26a). Then, the protein level of M-CSF was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We found that secretion of M-CSF was significantly decreased in the CM of HepG2-miR-26a but significantly increased in HCCLM3-anti-miR-26a (Fig. 1a).

Fig. 1
figure 1

miR-26a suppressed the motility of macrophages by inhibiting M-CSF secretion. a After the modifications of miR-26a in HCC cell lines, the level of M-CSF in the CM of HCC cells was detected by ELISA. b THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA were treated with CM from all HCC cells, and their migration ability was assessed. c, d THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA were treated with CM from HCC cells with addition of M-CSF neutralizing antibody or control IgG, and their migration was assessed

Full size image

To explore whether miR-26a affects motility of macrophages, a migration assay was conducted using THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA. We found that the migration of THP-1 cells was inhibited by the CM of HepG2-miR-26a cells and induced by the CM from HCCLM3-anti-miR-26a cells (Fig. 1b) in comparison to CM from the control cells.

To detect whether the inhibitory effect of miR-26a on motility of macrophages was mediated by M-CSF, we added M-CSF-neutralizing antibody and human M-CSF protein into the CM we collected. The results showed that THP-1 cell migration was suppressed by the CM of HepG2 cells treated with M-CSF-neutralizing antibody and induced by the CM of HepG2 cells treated with the extrinsic M-CSF protein. Furthermore, the difference in migration ability between HepG2-control and HepG2-miR-26a cells was eliminated (Fig. 1c). Similar results were also found in HCCLM3 cells (Fig. 1d).

miR-26a inhibited the expression of M-CSF by regulating the PI3K/Akt pathway

To explore whether miR-26a affects M-CSF expression through the PI3K/Akt pathway, the PI3K/Akt pathway inhibitor LY294002 was used. The results showed that expression of M-CSF in HepG2 cells was inhibited by LY294002 (Fig. 2a), and p-Akt was down-regulated, but the total Akt expression was not affected (Fig. 2d). Migration of THP-1 cells was inhibited (Fig. 2b, c). LY294002 treatment also eliminated the difference in M-CSF secretion and migration of THP-1 cells among HepG2-wt, HepG2-control, and HepG2-miR-26a cells. Similar results were also found in HCCLM3 cells (Fig. 2e–h).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The inhibiting effect of miR-26a on macrophages mainly through regulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. LY294002 was used to treat HCC cells, and the CM was collected. a, f The expression levels of M-CSF in the CM of all HCC cells were assessed by ELISA. b, c, g, h The effect of CM on migration of THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA was assessed. d, e The expression of Akt and p-Akt in HCC cells were examined by Western blot

Full size image

miR-26a affected polarization of macrophages

Because M1 macrophages produce higher levels of interleukin (IL)-12b and IL-23 and lower levels of IL-10, CCL17, and CCL22 compared with M2 macrophages [50, 51], we examined mRNA expression of these cytokines in the THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA and treated with the CM of HCC cells to study whether miR-26a affects polarization of macrophages. The results showed that the THP-1 cells treated with CM of HepG2-miR-26a cells expressed more IL-12b and IL-23 mRNA and less CCL22, CCL17, and IL-10 mRNA in comparison with THP-1 cells treated with the CM of HepG2-control cells (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the THP-1 cells treated with CM of HCCLM3-anti-miR-26a cells had lower IL-12b and IL-23 mRNA expression but higher CCL22, CCL17, and IL-10 mRNA expression.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The regulatory effect of miR-26a on a panel of mRNA expressed by macrophages. THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA were treated with CM from HCC cells. The mRNA expression of IL-12b, IL-23, IL-10, CCL17, and CCL22 in the THP-1 cells treated with CM from HepG2-miR-26a and HepG2-control cells (a) or HCCLM3-anti-miR-26a and HCCLM3-control cells (b) were detected by RT-PCR

Full size image

miR-26a inhibited tumor growth and recruitment of macrophages in HCC xenograft models

To evaluate the role of miR-26a on recruitment of macrophages, we established HepG2 and HCCLM3 xenograft models. Similar to our previous findings [27], HepG2-miR-26a tumors had a decreased tumor volume, while HCCLM3-anti-miR-26a tumors had an increased volume compared with their parental cell lines, respectively (Fig. 4a, b). Further investigation of the M-CSF expression and infiltrating macrophages revealed that HepG2-miR-26a tumors had lower M-CSF expression and a decreased number of infiltrating macrophages compared with HepG2-control tumors (Fig. 4c, d). HCCLM3-anti-miR-26a tumors had higher M-CSF expression and fewer macrophages compared with HCCLM3-control tumors (Fig. 4e, f).

Fig 4
figure 4

The role of miR-26a on M-CSF expression and recruitment of macrophages in vivo. HCC cells were injected into the right flanks of nude mice. a, b The tumor growth curves of subcutaneous tumors were assessed. c, d The M-CSF expression and CD68 expression in the tumors of HepG2 cells were assessed by immunohistochemistry. e, f The M-CSF expression and CD68 expression in the tumors of HCCLM3 cells were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Representative images are shown (×200)

Full size image

miR-26a expression was inversely correlated with M-CSF expression and infiltrating macrophages in tumors from patients with HCC

To examine whether miR-26a expression was correlated with M-CSF expression and the density of macrophages, we examined M-CSF expression in 52 patients with HCC and CD68 expression in 80 patients with HCC. miR-26a expression data were obtained in our previous study [42]. The representative images of M-CSF and CD68 immunostaining are shown in Fig. 5a. The statistical results for M-CSF expression showed that miR-26a expression was inversely correlated with the M-CSF expression (Fig. 5b). After dividing the patients into two equal groups, using the median value of miR-26a expression as the cutoff point, we found that patients with higher miR-26a expression had lower M-CSF expression compared with patients with lower miR-26a expression (Fig. 5c). We found similar results in the analysis of the relation between miR-26a and CD68 expression (Fig. 5d, e).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The relationship between miR-26a and the expression M-CSF and the density of macrophages in HCC tissue. a The HCC tissue microarrays were used to analyze M-CSF expression and density of macrophages through immunohistochemistry. Representative images are shown (×200). b, c The relationship between M-CSF expression and miR-26a expression was analyzed. d, e The relationship between the density of macrophages and miR-26a expression was analyzed. IOD integrated optical density

Full size image

Discussion

miR-26a has been reported to be able to reduce proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis in HCC [27, 44, 47, 48]. We further demonstrated that miR-26a can regulate the recruitment of macrophages. Some studies have reported miRNAs associated with macrophage infiltration, apoptosis, and phenotype. For example, let-7d suppresses macrophage infiltration by targeting COL3A1 and CCL7 [52], miR-142-5p can regulate apoptosis of macrophages by targeting TGF-β2 [53], and miR-155 can modulate macrophage polarization by targeting C/EBP-β [54]. Here, we first demonstrated that miR-26a can suppress macrophage recruitment by regulating M-CSF expression in HCC.

In our previous study, we found that miR-26a expression was lower in HCC tumor samples than in paired noncancerous liver tissue, and patients with lower miR-26a expression had shorter overall survival compared with patients with higher miR-26a expression [42]. The underlying mechanism related to miR-26a may be suppression of HCC cell proliferation and metastasis by regulation of the IL-6-stat3 signaling pathway and inhibition of angiogenesis in HCC by down-regulating Akt/VEGF signaling [27, 47, 48]. In addition, Kota et al. [44] reported that miR-26a can inhibit cancer cell proliferation in an HCC mouse model by targeting cyclin D2 and E2. However, the underlying mechanisms for how miR-26a affects the survival of patients with HCC are still not fully understood. The present study was designed to show a new role of miR-26a in the recruitment of macrophages in HCC.

M-CSF is one of the major cytokines controlling the proliferation, differentiation, and functional regulation of macrophage [55]. The expression level of M-CSF has been found to be associated with higher histological tumor grading, more frequent metastases, and poor prognosis in many cancer types, including papillary renal cell carcinoma, serous and mucinous ovarian epithelial tumors, endometrioid carcinomas, breast cancer, and especially HCC [51, 56–59]. Our previous study showed that high expression of M-CSF in peritumoral liver tissue is associated with poor survival after curative resection of HCC [6, 22]. Various miRNAs have been reported to be involved in the regulation of M-CSF expression. Mandal et al. [49] found miR-21a can induce M-CSF expression by regulating the PI3K/Akt signal pathway. Cimino et al. [60] reported M-CSF is a direct target of miR-148b. Wang et al. [61] identified M-CSF as a target gene of miR-214, and Zhang et al. [62] reported M-CSF as a target of miR-128. The present study found miR-26a regulates M-CSF expression and recruitment of macrophages. In addition, M-CSF also plays an important role in the polarization of macrophages. It can stimulate macrophages and induce them to exhibit an anti-inflammatory M2-type of activation, which produces higher IL-12/23 but lower CCL17, CCL22, and IL-10 [50, 51, 63, 64]. The present study also found miR-26a can induce a pro-inflammatory M1-type of activation for macrophages and may affect the overall survival of patients with HCC partly through reducing macrophage recruitment and down-regulating M-CSF expression.

This study has some potential limitations. We found miR-26a can inhibit macrophage recruitment by down-regulating M-CSF expression, but recruitment might be influenced by many factors. Our preliminary study showed miR-26a expression did not affect expression of CCL2 and GM-CSF (data not shown), which are two major cytokines regulating recruitment of macrophages [51, 65].

M-CSF inhibitor has been reported to impede macrophage recruitment in malignancy [66]. For HCC, zoledronic acid, a bisphosphonate with a macrophage-modulating effect, can inhibit growth of HCC cells and delay disease progression of bone metastases [67, 68]. Our previous study reported that depletion of macrophages using zoledronic acid can enhance the effect of sorafenib in HCC as well [69]. With all data considered together, M-CSF and macrophage might be potential therapeutic targets for HCC. Our data provide evidence that miR-26a may suppress the recruitment of macrophages by down-regulating M-CSF expression. The data also suggest that miR-26a may be a marker for the grade of malignancy in HCC as well as a potential therapeutic target in patients with HCC.

Methods

Cell lines

The HCC cells which were altered expression levels of miR-26a by using recombinant lentivirus vector (Genechem, Shanghai, China) were established in our previous study. Human monocyte cell line THP-1 were obtained from Shanghai Institute of Cell Biology (Shanghai, China). The HCC cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS), and THP-1 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 10 % FBS. All cells were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with an atmosphere of 5 % CO2.

Collection of the CM

HCC cells were treated with LY294002 (20 μM, Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) or vehicle for 12 h, then incubated in DMEM with 0.1 % BSA for 24 h. The CM was centrifuged for 20 min at 3000 rpm, and the resultant pellet was stored at −80 °C. In the M-CSF blocking assay experiments, neutralizing antibody against M-CSF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and control IgG were added to CM 30 min before further experiments.

Quantification of M-CSF in the CM

ELISA (R&D Systems) was used to measure M-CSF concentrations in the CM. The total protein concentration was measured by bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay, and the M-CSF concentration was normalized according to the total cellular protein.

Cell migration assay

Chambers (Corning, Tewksbury, MA) with 8.0-μm polycarbonate filter inserted in 24-well plates were used in the quantitative cell migration assays as described before [27]. THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA (1 × 105 cells/well) were added in the upper chamber, and the lower chamber was filled with the previously collected CM. The 24-well plates filled with cells were placed in a thermostatic incubator at 37 °C for 16 h. Thereafter, the migrated cells were fixed with methanol, stained with crystal violet, and photographed under an inverted microscope. The areas of stained cells from three random fields at × 200 magnification were assessed by using Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics Inc, Bethesda, MD).

Western blot assay

As described in our previous study [27], cells were lysed in buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50-mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 % SDS, 1 % Triton X-100) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Fifty micrograms of whole cell extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5 % nonfat milk for 2 h and then incubated with respective primary antibody overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Blots were visualized with an ECL detection kit (Pierce, IL) and analyzed using Quantity One 1-D Analysis Software (Bio-Rad, San Francisco, CA).

Real-time PCR assay

Equal amounts of THP-1 cells stimulated by PMA were treated with the previously collected CM. After 48 h, total RNA was extracted using TRIzol Reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). As described before [69], reverse transcription reactions and quantitative real-time PCR were performed using RT-PCR kit (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). The primers used for the amplification of human genes are listed as follows: IL-12 (5′-TGCCCATTGAGGTCATGGTG-3′ [forward]; 5′-CTTGGGTGGGTCAGGTTTGA-3′ [reverse]), IL-23 (5′-CAGAGAGAATCAGGCTCAAAGC-3′ [forward]; 5′-AGCAACAGCAGCATTACAGC-3′ [reverse]), CCL17 (5′-CTGGGACCTCCACCGTT-3′ [forward]; 5′-CTCACTGTGGCTCTTCTTCGT-3′ [reverse]), CCL22 (5′-AAACTAATGTCCCTCCCCTCTC-3′ [forward]; 5′-TTTGGGGCTTCACATTGACC-3′ [reverse]), IL-10 (5′-TGCCTAACATGCTTCGAGATC-3′ [forward]; 5′-CCAGGTAACCCTTAAAGTCCTC-3′ [reverse]), and ACTB (5′-ACTGGGACGACATGGAGAAAATC-3′ [forward]; 5′-CTCGCGGTTGGCCTTGG-3′ [reverse]).

Xenograft model of human HCC in nude mice

As described in our previous study [27], male BALB/c nude mice (5 weeks old) were purchased from the Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Science, and housed under specific pathogen-free conditions. The experimental protocol was approved by the Shanghai Medical Experimental Animal Care Commission. Twenty mice were randomized into four groups, and various cancer cells (6 × 106 cells) in 200 μl of normal saline were implanted by subcutaneous injection to obtain subcutaneous tumors. Tumor dimensions were measured by vernier caliper every 4 days, and the mice were killed after 4 weeks. After final measurement, the tumors were placed in 4 % paraformaldehyde solution. The tumor volume was calculated according to the formula: tumor volume = (largest diameter × perpendicular height2)/2.

Immunohistochemical assay

Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues from animal Immunohistochemistry was performed on the sections or tissue arrays containing tumor tissues from patients with HCC who had antibodies against M-CSF (1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, MA) or CD68 (1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, MA). The integrated optical density (for M-CSF) or area (for CD68) of positive staining/total area was quantified by Image-Pro Plus software [27]. For the reading of each antibody staining, a uniform setting for all the slides was applied.

Patients and follow-up

HCC specimens used in the immunohistochemical assay were obtained from patients who received radical resection between 1999 and 2003 at the Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital (Fudan University, Shanghai, China); these specimens have been described previously [27, 42]. None of the patients received any preoperative anticancer treatment. The research was approved by the research ethics committee of Zhongshan Hospital. A total of 80 cases were used to examine CD68 expression, and 52 cases were used to examine CD68 expression. The miR-26a expression data were collected in our previous study. All the patients were followed up until 2011 with a median observation time of 60.8 months. This study was approved by the Zhongshan Hospital Research Ethics Committee. All patients provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 (SPSS, Inc.). Quantitative variables were analyzed using the unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test and Spearman correlation test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Abbreviations

CCL17:

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 17

CCL22:

Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 22

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

IL-10:

Interleukin-10

IL-12:

Interleukin-12

IL-23:

Interleukin-23

M-CSF:

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor

miR-26a:

microRNA-26a

TAMs:

Tumor-associated macrophages

References

  1. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2012;379:1245–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma surgery—review of the past and prospects for the 21st century. J Surg Oncol. 2005;91:95–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang JD, Nakamura I, Roberts LR. The tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and therapeutic targets. Semin Cancer Biol. 2011;21:35–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marongiu F, Serra MP, Sini M, Angius F, Laconi E. Clearance of senescent hepatocytes in a neoplastic-prone microenvironment delays the emergence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging (Albany NY). 2014;6:26–34.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Budhu A, Forgues M, Ye QH, Jia HL, He P, Zanetti KA, et al. Prediction of venous metastases, recurrence, and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma based on a unique immune response signature of the liver microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2006;10:99–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu XD, Zhang JB, Zhuang PY, Zhu HG, Zhang W, Xiong YQ, et al. High expression of macrophage colony-stimulating factor in peritumoral liver tissue is associated with poor survival after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2707–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mantovani A, Germano G, Marchesi F, Locatelli M, Biswas SK. Cancer-promoting tumor-associated macrophages: new vistas and open questions. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:2522–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Solinas G, Germano G, Mantovani A, Allavena P. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) as major players of the cancer-related inflammation. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86:1065–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Porta C, Larghi P, Rimoldi M, Totaro MG, Allavena P, Mantovani A, et al. Cellular and molecular pathways linking inflammation and cancer. Immunobiology. 2009;214:761–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mantovani A, Sica A. Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22:231–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Qian BZ, Pollard JW. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell. 2010;141:39–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuang DM, Wu Y, Chen N, Cheng J, Zhuang SM, Zheng L. Tumor-derived hyaluronan induces formation of immunosuppressive macrophages through transient early activation of monocytes. Blood. 2007;110:587–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuang DM, Peng C, Zhao Q, Wu Y, Chen MS, Zheng L. Activated monocytes in peritumoral stroma of hepatocellular carcinoma promote expansion of memory T helper 17 cells. Hepatology. 2010;51:154–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuang DM, Zhao Q, Peng C, Xu J, Zhang JP, Wu C, et al. Activated monocytes in peritumoral stroma of hepatocellular carcinoma foster immune privilege and disease progression through PD-L1. J Exp Med. 2009;206:1327–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding T, Xu J, Wang F, Shi M, Zhang Y, Li SP, et al. High tumor-infiltrating macrophage density predicts poor prognosis in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:381–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujita N, Nishie A, Aishima S, Kubo Y, Asayama Y, Ishigami K, et al. Role of tumor-associated macrophages in the angiogenesis of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma: pathological-radiological correlation. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:2499–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Gordon S. Cytokine regulation of the macrophage (M phi) system studied using the colony stimulating factor-1-deficient op/op mouse. Physiol Rev. 1996;76:927–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mantovani A, Bottazzi B, Colotta F, Sozzani S, Ruco L. The origin and function of tumor-associated macrophages. Immunol Today. 1992;13:265–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zins K, Abraham D, Sioud M, Aharinejad S. Colon cancer cell-derived tumor necrosis factor-alpha mediates the tumor growth-promoting response in macrophages by up-regulating the colony-stimulating factor-1 pathway. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1038–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pollard JW. Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:71–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Condeelis J, Pollard JW. Macrophages: obligate partners for tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Cell. 2006;124:263–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jia JB, Wang WQ, Sun HC, Zhu XD, Liu L, Zhuang PY, et al. High expression of macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor in peritumoral liver tissue is associated with poor outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Oncologist. 2010;15:732–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsai WC, Hsu PW, Lai TC, Chau GY, Lin CW, Chen CM, et al. MicroRNA-122, a tumor suppressor microRNA that regulates intrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009;49:1571–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiong Y, Fang JH, Yun JP, Yang J, Zhang Y, Jia WH, et al. Effects of microRNA-29 on apoptosis, tumorigenicity, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010;51:836–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu T, Zhu Y, Xiong Y, Ge YY, Yun JP, Zhuang SM. MicroRNA-195 suppresses tumorigenicity and regulates G1/S transition of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2009;50:113–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anand S. A brief primer on microRNAs and their roles in angiogenesis. Vasc Cell. 2013;5:2.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chai ZT, Kong J, Zhu XD, Zhang YY, Lu L, Zhou JM, et al. MicroRNA-26a inhibits angiogenesis by down-regulating VEGFA through the PIK3C2alpha/Akt/HIF-1alpha pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77957.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fish JE, Santoro MM, Morton SU, Yu S, Yeh RF, Wythe JD, et al. miR-126 regulates angiogenic signaling and vascular integrity. Dev Cell. 2008;15:272–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pecot CV, Rupaimoole R, Yang D, Akbani R, Ivan C, Lu C, et al. Tumour angiogenesis regulation by the miR-200 family. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2427.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mitra AK, Zillhardt M, Hua Y, Tiwari P, Murmann AE, Peter ME, et al. MicroRNAs reprogram normal fibroblasts into cancer-associated fibroblasts in ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:1100–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bezman NA, Chakraborty T, Bender T, Lanier LL. miR-150 regulates the development of NK and iNKT cells. J Exp Med. 2011;208:2717–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu K, Pan Q, Zhang X, Kong LQ, Fan J, Dai Z, et al. MiR-146a enhances angiogenic activity of endothelial cells in hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting PDGFRA expression. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:2071–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang P, Li QJ, Feng Y, Zhang Y, Markowitz GJ, Ning S, et al. TGF-beta-miR-34a-CCL22 signaling-induced Treg cell recruitment promotes venous metastases of HBV-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2012;22:291–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lu S, Gao Y, Huang X, Wang X. Cantharidin exerts anti-hepatocellular carcinoma by miR-214 modulating macrophage polarization. Int J Biol Sci. 2014;10:415–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maillot G, Lacroix-Triki M, Pierredon S, Gratadou L, Schmidt S, Benes V, et al. Widespread estrogen-dependent repression of micrornas involved in breast tumor cell growth. Cancer Res. 2009;69:8332–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang B, Liu XX, He JR, Zhou CX, Guo M, He M, et al. Pathologically decreased miR-26a antagonizes apoptosis and facilitates carcinogenesis by targeting MTDH and EZH2 in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:2–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu T, Wang XY, Gong RG, Li A, Yang S, Cao YT, et al. The expression profile of microRNAs in a model of 7,12-dimethyl-benz[a]anthrance-induced oral carcinogenesis in Syrian hamster. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2009;28:64.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Visone R, Pallante P, Vecchione A, Cirombella R, Ferracin M, Ferraro A, et al. Specific microRNAs are downregulated in human thyroid anaplastic carcinomas. Oncogene. 2007;26:7590–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Huse JT, Brennan C, Hambardzumyan D, Wee B, Pena J, Rouhanifard SH, et al. The PTEN-regulating microRNA miR-26a is amplified in high-grade glioma and facilitates gliomagenesis in vivo. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1327–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim H, Huang W, Jiang X, Pennicooke B, Park PJ, Johnson MD. Integrative genome analysis reveals an oncomir/oncogene cluster regulating glioblastoma survivorship. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:2183–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang J, Han C, Wu T. MicroRNA-26a promotes cholangiocarcinoma growth by activating beta-catenin. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:246–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ji J, Shi J, Budhu A, Yu Z, Forgues M, Roessler S, et al. MicroRNA expression, survival, and response to interferon in liver cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1437–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou J, Yu L, Gao X, Hu J, Wang J, Dai Z, et al. Plasma microRNA panel to diagnose hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4781–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kota J, Chivukula RR, O'Donnell KA, Wentzel EA, Montgomery CL, Hwang HW, et al. Therapeutic microRNA delivery suppresses tumorigenesis in a murine liver cancer model. Cell. 2009;137:1005–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu Y, Lu Y, Zhang Q, Liu JJ, Li TJ, Yang JR, et al. MicroRNA-26a/b and their host genes cooperate to inhibit the G1/S transition by activating the pRb protein. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:4615–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen L, Zheng J, Zhang Y, Yang L, Wang J, Ni J, et al. Tumor-specific expression of microRNA-26a suppresses human hepatocellular carcinoma growth via cyclin-dependent and -independent pathways. Mol Ther. 2011;19:1521–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yang X, Zhang XF, Lu X, Jia HL, Liang L, Dong QZ, et al. MicroRNA-26a suppresses angiogenesis in human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting hepatocyte growth factor-cMet pathway. Hepatology. 2014;59:1874–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang X, Liang L, Zhang XF, Jia HL, Qin Y, Zhu XC, et al. MicroRNA-26a suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting interleukin-6-Stat3 pathway. Hepatology. 2013;58:158–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Mandal CC, Ghosh-Choudhury T, Dey N, Choudhury GG, Ghosh-Choudhury N. miR-21 is targeted by omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid to regulate breast tumor CSF-1 expression. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1897–908.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:23–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Capece D, Fischietti M, Verzella D, Gaggiano A, Cicciarelli G, Tessitore A, et al. The inflammatory microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a pivotal role for tumor-associated macrophages. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:187204.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Su B, Zhao W, Shi B, Zhang Z, Yu X, Xie F, et al. Let-7d suppresses growth, metastasis, and tumor macrophage infiltration in renal cell carcinoma by targeting COL3A1 and CCL7. Mol Cancer. 2014;13:206.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Xu R, Bi C, Song J, Wang L, Ge C, Liu X, et al. Upregulation of miR-142-5p in atherosclerotic plaques and regulation of oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced apoptosis in macrophages. Mol Med Rep. 2015;11:3229–34.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. He M, Xu Z, Ding T, Kuang DM, Zheng L. MicroRNA-155 regulates inflammatory cytokine production in tumor-associated macrophages via targeting C/EBPbeta. Cell Mol Immunol. 2009;6:343–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hamilton JA, Achuthan A. Colony stimulating factors and myeloid cell biology in health and disease. Trends Immunol. 2013;34:81–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Scholl SM, Pallud C, Beuvon F, Hacene K, Stanley ER, Rohrschneider L, et al. Anti-colony-stimulating factor-1 antibody staining in primary breast adenocarcinomas correlates with marked inflammatory cell infiltrates and prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:120–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kawamura K, Komohara Y, Takaishi K, Katabuchi H, Takeya M. Detection of M2 macrophages and colony-stimulating factor 1 expression in serous and mucinous ovarian epithelial tumors. Pathol Int. 2009;59:300–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Espinosa I, Catasus L, DA E, Mozos A, Pedrola N, Bertolo C, et al. Stromal signatures in endometrioid endometrial carcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2014;27:631–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Behnes CL, Bremmer F, Hemmerlein B, Strauss A, Strobel P, Radzun HJ. Tumor-associated macrophages are involved in tumor progression in papillary renal cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2014;464:191–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cimino D, De Pitta C, Orso F, Zampini M, Casara S, Penna E, et al. miR148b is a major coordinator of breast cancer progression in a relapse-associated microRNA signature by targeting ITGA5, ROCK1, PIK3CA, NRAS, and CSF1. FASEB J. 2013;27:1223–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang YW, Shi DB, Chen X, Gao C, Gao P. Clinicopathological significance of microRNA-214 in gastric cancer and its effect on cell biological behaviour. PLoS One. 2014;9:e91307.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Zhang T, Yu J, Zhang Y, Li L, Chen Y, Li D, et al. Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis modulates intestinal epithelial miR-128 levels to decrease macrophage recruitment via macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J Infect Dis. 2014;209:2000–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Fleetwood AJ, Lawrence T, Hamilton JA, Cook AD. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (CSF) and macrophage CSF-dependent macrophage phenotypes display differences in cytokine profiles and transcription factor activities: implications for CSF blockade in inflammation. J Immunol. 2007;178:5245–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Fleetwood AJ, Dinh H, Cook AD, Hertzog PJ, Hamilton JA. GM-CSF- and M-CSF-dependent macrophage phenotypes display differential dependence on type I interferon signaling. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86:411–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Laoui D, Van Overmeire E, De Baetselier P, Van Ginderachter JA, Raes G. Functional relationship between tumor-associated macrophages and macrophage colony-stimulating factor as contributors to cancer progression. Front Immunol. 2014;5:489.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Cheng H, Clarkson PW, Gao D, Pacheco M, Wang Y, Nielsen TO. Therapeutic antibodies targeting CSF1 impede macrophage recruitment in a xenograft model of tenosynovial giant cell tumor. Sarcoma. 2010;2010:174528.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Katamura Y, Aikata H, Hashimoto Y, Kimura Y, Kawaoka T, Takaki S, et al. Zoledronic acid delays disease progression of bone metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2010;40:1195–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu Q, Tao YH, Bai RZ, Chang SJ, Hua D. Zoledronic acid inhibits growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126:1486–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang W, Zhu XD, Sun HC, Xiong YQ, Zhuang PY, Xu HX, et al. Depletion of tumor-associated macrophages enhances the effect of sorafenib in metastatic liver cancer models by antimetastatic and antiangiogenic effects. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:3420–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81472224 and 81372655); National Science and Technology Project for Infectious Diseases (No. 2012ZX10002-017, 2013ZX10002007, and 2012ZX10002012-004); and Shanghai Natural Science Fund for Youth Scholars (12ZR1442300).

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 136 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China

      Zong-Tao Chai, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Jian-Yang Ao, Dong-Mei Gao, Ning Zhang, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Bo-Gen Ye, De-Ning Ma, Hao Cai & Hui-Chuan Sun

    2. Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Ministry of Education, Fudan University, 136 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China

      Zong-Tao Chai, Xiao-Dong Zhu, Jian-Yang Ao, Dong-Mei Gao, Ning Zhang, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Bo-Gen Ye, De-Ning Ma, Hao Cai & Hui-Chuan Sun

    3. Department of Pancreatic and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

      Wen-Quan Wang

    4. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

      Wen-Quan Wang

    5. Pancreatic Cancer Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China

      Wen-Quan Wang

    6. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

      Jian Kong

    Authors
    1. Zong-Tao Chai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Xiao-Dong Zhu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Jian-Yang Ao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Wen-Quan Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Dong-Mei Gao
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Jian Kong
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Ning Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Yuan-Yuan Zhang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    9. Bo-Gen Ye
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    10. De-Ning Ma
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    11. Hao Cai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    12. Hui-Chuan Sun
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Hui-Chuan Sun.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    ZTC, XDZ, and JYA performed the experimental work. WQW, DMG, JK, NZ, YYZ, BGY, and DNM participated in the experiments. XDZ and HCS conceived the study and participated in its design and coordination. The manuscript was written by ZTC, XDZ, and JYA. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Zong-Tao Chai, Xiao-Dong Zhu and Jian-Yang Ao contributed equally to this work.

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

    The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

    To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Chai, ZT., Zhu, XD., Ao, JY. et al. microRNA-26a suppresses recruitment of macrophages by down-regulating macrophage colony-stimulating factor expression through the PI3K/Akt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hematol Oncol 8, 56 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0150-4

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-015-0150-4

    Keywords

    Journal of Hematology & Oncology

    ISSN: 1756-8722

    Contact us