Journal of Hematology & Oncology
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 ReviewMolecular prognostic markers for adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogeneticsTara K Gregory1 , David Wald2 , Yichu Chen1 , Johanna M Vermaat2 , Yin Xiong1 and William Tse1  1
Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA 2
Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA author email corresponding author email
Journal of Hematology & Oncology 2009,
2:23doi:10.1186/1756-8722-2-23 Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous disorder that results from a block in the differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells along with uncontrolled proliferation. In approximately 60% of cases, specific recurrent chromosomal aberrations can be identified by modern cytogenetic techniques. This cytogenetic information is the single most important tool to classify patients at their initial diagnosis into three prognostic categories: favorable, intermediate, and poor risk. Currently, favorable risk AML patients are usually treated with contemporary chemotherapy while poor risk AML patients receive allogeneic stem cell transplantation if suitable stem cell donors exist. The largest subgroup of AML patients (~40%) have no identifiable cytogenetic abnormalities and are classified as intermediate risk. The optimal therapeutic strategies for these patients are still largely unclear. Recently, it is becoming increasingly evident that it is possible to identify a subgroup of poorer risk patients among those with normal cytogenic AML (NC-AML). Molecular risk stratification for NC-AML patients may be possible due to mutations of NPM1, FLT3, MLL, and CEBPα as well as alterations in expression levels of BAALC, MN1, ERG, and AF1q. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm if poorer risk NC-AML patients have improved clinical outcomes after more aggressive therapy. |